Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05699
Original file (BC 2012 05699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05699
			COUNSEL:
			HEARING DESIRED: NO
	

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be named as former spouse under the Survivor Benefit Plan 
(SBP).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Pursuant to the Judgment of Absolute Divorce decree, dated 11 
Feb 11, that reflects she was designated as the former spouse 
beneficiary for her ex-husband’s SBP annuity, she should not be 
denied eligibility for this benefit.  Counsel notes that the 
judgment was signed on 11 Feb 11; however, it was not entered 
until 10 Mar 11.  Under Maryland law, a divorce decree is not 
valid until it has been entered by the Clerk of the Court.  In 
this case, the applicant’s Judgment of Absolute Divorce was not 
a valid document until it was entered by the Clerk of the Court 
on 10 Mar 11.  

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of a 
letter from counsel, a copy of a letter from DFAS, a copy of her 
Judgment of Absolute Divorce decree, a copy of a certified 
letter from counsel, a copy of DD Form 2656, Survivor Benefit 
Plan (SBP)/Reserve Component (RC) SBP Requests for Deemed 
Election, and mail receipts.

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 5 Nov 13, the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor sent the applicant’s 
counsel an email requesting an affidavit be provided to confirm 
that the former member has not remarried.  As of this date, this 
office has received no response.

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force, which is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  The Defense Enrollment 
Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) reflects the applicant and 
the member married on 23 Nov 73, and divorced on 11 Feb 11.  
Prior to the member’s retirement on 1 Jul 97, he elected spouse 
and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay.  Although 
unenforceable, the divorce decree states that the applicant is 
entitled to full survivor annuity benefits related to the 
member’s pension with the Air Force and “shall pay for the cost 
of said benefit for her share of the monthly annuity.”  SBP 
premiums continue to be deducted from the member’s retired pay 
and DFAS-CL records continue to erroneously reflect the 
applicant’s name and date of birth (9 Mar 44) as the eligible 
spouse beneficiary.  They cannot confirm if either party has 
remarried.  However, it would be appropriate to enforce the 
parties’ court-ordered agreement to continue SBP coverage, an 
asset the court apparently intended to award, on the applicant’s 
behalf.

In the interest of justice and absent a competing claimant, 
DPFFF recommends correcting the record to show the applicant 
submitted a valid request that former spouse SBP coverage based 
on full retired pay was deemed effective 12 Feb 11.  

The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Counsel submits the applicant’s acceptance of the DPSIAR 
recommendation.  In addition, the applicant accepts the 
responsibility for the cost of the SBP per the divorce decree, 
to include retroactive SBP costs.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit E.  

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  While we do 
not take issue with the applicant’s assertion that her divorce 
decree ordered her former husband to continue coverage for her 
under SBP, he failed to convert the coverage to former spouse 
coverage within one year of their divorce as required by law.  
Regrettably, the applicant also failed to execute a deemed 
election for coverage within the one year timeframe.  We note 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends 
approval.  However, since the period of time allowed by law to 
make a deemed election for former spouse coverage has already 
passed, the only way the Board can grant the applicant’s request 
is if an affidavit is provided to confirm that the former member 
has not remarried.  Consequently, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief at 
this time.  However, the Board is willing to reconsider the 
applicant’s request if she provides the required affidavit as 
evidence proving the former member has not remarried.  
________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05699 in Executive Session on 30 Sep 13 and 14 
Jan 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Dec 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 11 Mar 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 mar 13.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Counsel, dated 4 Apr 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05605

    Original file (BC 2013 05605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to void his election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). If the service member voluntarily files an election for former spouse coverage, a request to change that election to spouse coverage may be made at any time after the service member remarries. As the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03972

    Original file (BC 2013 03972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, which was incorporated in the divorce decree, the former service member agreed the applicant would receive the “former spouse annuity.” There is no evidence the former service member or the applicant submitted a valid election for former spouse coverage within one year following their divorce as required by law. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02658

    Original file (BC 2014 02658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The service member responded with a signed and notarized affidavit, dated 29 July 2014, which indicates he is currently married effective 16 November 2002 and his current spouse did not complete a Release of Benefits (Exhibit C). He did not request SBP benefits for his current spouse because he did not know that she was eligible. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the application was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01582

    Original file (BC 2014 01582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as it would be a great injustice if his former spouse’s present spouse were to die or they were to divorce and she were not entitled to the SBP again. The applicant and his former spouse were married on 21 Aug 71 and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Aug 91 retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00393

    Original file (BC 2014 00393 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00393 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Their divorce decree directed her former spouse to maintain her as the beneficiary under the SBP. The applicant and the deceased former member married on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00018

    Original file (BC 2014 00018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not realize in order for his former spouse to receive an SBP annuity he had to elect SBP coverage for her prior to his retirement. There is no evidence of an Air Force error; however, to preclude a possible injustice, it would be appropriate to void the applicant’s 8 Feb 12, election to decline SBP coverage and correct his record to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 Aug 12, naming his former spouse as the eligible...